UofL Basketball – Statement from Scott Tompsett on behalf of Rick Pitino

KFC Yum Center
KFC Yum Center

The finding against Coach Pitino is one of the weakest I’ve ever seen against a head coach.

The original allegation was that Coach Pitino failed to monitor by not actively looking for and evaluating red flags. But throughout the entire investigation and the nearly twelve-hour hearing before the Committee on Infractions, not once did either the enforcement staff or the Committee ever identify a single red flag. And today’s decision does not mention the phrase “red flag” a single time.

Instead, the decision hinges on a vaguely-worded rationale about creating an environment in which the violations eventually occurred, alleged delegating of monitoring to assistant coaches and Coach Pitino’s failure to train Mr. McGee.

But the decision does not identify a single specific thing that Coach Pitino should have done, that he wasn’t already doing, that would have either prevented or detected the illicit activities. The secret and deliberately hidden illicit activities certainly did not occur because Coach Pitino did not properly train Mr. McGee.

Today’s decision breaks with established head coach control precedent and imposes a standard of strict liability.

Coach Pitino intends to exercise his right to appeal the finding and the penalty.

Scott Tompsett
Attorney at Law